Lessons I've Learned

After a full 2 semesters at JUC, a handful of important themes have emerged that have heavily influenced my approach to the Bible. Some may be alarming or controversial. Here are the cliff notes in no particular order:

1. World view affects our sense of self and our existence before a divine entity. During our formative years, our social environment, the geographical terrain of our homestead, values disseminated to us from our parents (or lack there of), the current political climate, socio-economic status, religious dogma, and cultural axioms all leave an indelible impression upon our psychological state. This immutable predisposition affects how we perceive the world around us. Each author of the Bible wrote with a particular bent based on what he/she experienced in their individual lives or they wrote using themes decipherable to the audience they wrote to.

2. Geography and $$$$ dictates the flow of the Biblical stories. Israel's most coveted natural resource was it's road system. Stationed in the middle of the Ancient Near East (ANE), all traffic flowed through this economic turn style rendering it a hotly contested area. Empires could make a pretty penny by taxing imports and exports if they controlled Israel's roads and ports. David and Solomon expanded their empires because they wanted more money. The more territory they governed, the more revenue they could generate for their kingdom. Why did Putin invade Crimea? Seaports+Commerce=$$$$$. Not much has changed today.

3. The Bible is a book describing the relationship between God and Israel. The Bible is a book grounded in reality and historical events. It was not written in a vacuum, nor was it specifically intended to speak to 21st century Americans. Thus, as we impose our own theological grid on the Biblical text and neglect to let the characters and stories speak for themselves in their own time and place, we unknowingly dehumanize the participants in the epic story of God by flattening them out to 1 dimensional figures. Furthermore, we delegitimize the credibility of the authors if we think, being thousands of years removed from the actual events, to jettison the realities of the text in favor of garnering spiritual abstraction for applicable purposes. "Hyper-Spiritual Analytics" do a huge disservice to the purposes of the authors and the characters themselves. Moreover, it replaces psychologically motivated sentient beings with inanimate puppets aimlessly dancing across a stage, limbs robotically guided by cosmic fingers.

4. Our modern version of truth drastically differs from the ancient version of truth. Modernity suggests truth is based on verifiable empirical evidence. It must be proven to be true. Black does not equal white and A does not equal B. We live in a binary world. Conversely, truth in the ANE did not have to be 100% factual in order to be considered true. What is more important is the meaning of the story. In his book "The Art of Biblical Narrative", Robert Alter classifies Biblical narrative as "historical prose fiction." To simplify, the stories in the Bible are based on historical realities but the details, such as dialogue, may be the author's invention purposefully used to convey character traits, motivations, and irony. To some this may sound like blasphemy. But again, we must bear in mind the world view the ANE held-not ours. This idea circles back to point number 1 I mentioned earlier-world view. Perhaps not all canonized scripture was considered 100% true. The mechanisms and people through which God operated was held in higher regard.

5. Some core tenets of Evangelical theology are simply not true and are at best misguided. They are all recent phenomenon's that have little explicit textual foundation. Rapture theology AKA Dispensationalism was born out of John Nelson Darby's overzealous attempt to put flesh on a "vision" Margaret MacDonald experienced in 1830. The Reform movement's stance on original sin and the "total depravity" doctrine of mankind was based on Augustine's faulty interpretation of a corrupted Latin text of Romans 5:12. Moreover, Augustine's exegetical conclusions concerning Romans, especially Romans 7, acted in large part as an overreaction to Pelagius' polemic that sin is derived from man's free will to imitate Adam (i.e. we are not flawed human beings from birth who are genetically predisposed to sin) and sin can be overcome by imitating Jesus. The Reformation also introduced us to "Sola Scriptura" (by Scriputre alone) which ironically has no scriptural basis deeming it self-referentially incoherent.

6. I love a major portion of Orthodox theology. Mystery dominates certainty. Man possess infinite value. God invites man to be His partner in the work of creation. The goal is to attain oneness with God and recapitulate the primeval story of the Garden of Eden when we were fully one with God.